1. Properties of the function x^x (Post-Doc Ergo Propter Hoc H/T Dave Richeson). Can you prove:
\int_{0}^{1} x^{x} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-n)^{-n}
2. Steve Strogatz on Einstein's boyhood proofs (newyorker).
A strange derivative: let f(x)=x^2 \sin(1/x^2) for x \ne 0, and f(0)=0. This function has f'(0)=0 even though \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} f'(x), does not exist.
\int_{0}^{1} x^{x} = -\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} (-n)^{-n}
2. Steve Strogatz on Einstein's boyhood proofs (newyorker).
The style of his Pythagorean proof, elegant and seemingly effortless, also portends something of the later scientist. Einstein draws a single line in Step 1, after which the Pythagorean theorem falls out like a ripe avocado. The same spirit of minimalism characterizes all of Einstein’s adult work. Incredibly, in the part of his special-relativity paper where he revolutionized our notions of space and time, he used no math beyond high-school algebra and geometry.3. Via Twitter, Steven Strogatz @stevenstrogatz
A strange derivative: let f(x)=x^2 \sin(1/x^2) for x \ne 0, and f(0)=0. This function has f'(0)=0 even though \lim_{x \rightarrow 0} f'(x), does not exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment