Last night, I had trouble going to bed, and ended up watching almost the entire Republican presidential primary debate. While many supposed heavy-weights were absent, the actual debate was an interesting presentation of the potential diversity in Republican thought.
There was Tim Pawlenty, a front runner; Herman Cain, the African-American pizza-guy; Rick Santorum, the social conservative; and Ron Paul and Gary Johnson, the libertarians.
Not unsurprisingly, I found Ron Paul and Gary Johnson the most interesting candidates. As a theorist, I find their uniform small government stance on both fiscal and social issues, ummm, how do I put it, more self-consistent?.
For example, when asked about gay marriage or prostitution, Ron Paul said a small federal government had no business regulating social aspects of life. Governments should not tell people how to live. I wonder how such positions will play with Republican primary voters.
There was Tim Pawlenty, a front runner; Herman Cain, the African-American pizza-guy; Rick Santorum, the social conservative; and Ron Paul and Gary Johnson, the libertarians.
Not unsurprisingly, I found Ron Paul and Gary Johnson the most interesting candidates. As a theorist, I find their uniform small government stance on both fiscal and social issues, ummm, how do I put it, more self-consistent?.
For example, when asked about gay marriage or prostitution, Ron Paul said a small federal government had no business regulating social aspects of life. Governments should not tell people how to live. I wonder how such positions will play with Republican primary voters.
No comments:
Post a Comment